Why Bitcoin Is Down 37% From Its All-Time High — A Critical Analysis GPT-5.5 vs Claude Opus 4 — We Put Both Through Hell So You Don't Have To 10 Free Developer Tools That Don't Suck (and Actually Respect Your Time) $300 Billion in One Quarter — But Strip Out Four Companies and the Story Changes Completely TypeScript Hit Number One on GitHub. Now Comes the Hard Part. Rust Is Now in Half of All Enterprise Codebases — and the Language War Is the Wrong Thing to Watch The $10.5 Trillion Problem: Why AI Is Making Cybersecurity Simultaneously Better and Worse Ransomware Is Now a Franchise Business — And It's Growing Faster Than the Companies It Attacks DeFi Is Growing Up — And It's Not Nearly as Fun as It Used to Be Bitcoin ETFs Absorbed More Capital in 18 Months Than Gold ETFs Did in 15 Years

AI Model Benchmark Comparator

AI Model Benchmark Comparator — GPT vs Claude vs Gemini — Hitechies Tools
Hitechies / Tools / AI Benchmark Comparator
✦ Last updated May 2026 · Benchmarks sourced from official evaluations and independent testing
Select models to compare
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
GPT-4o
OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
Benchmark scores
Benchmark GPT-5.5 Claude Opus 4 Gemini 2.5 Pro GPT-4o Claude Sonnet 4 Llama 4 Scout
Model overview
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
Coding
90%
Reasoning
88%
Math
91%
Knowledge
88%
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
Coding
88%
Reasoning
91%
Math
87%
Knowledge
90%
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
Coding
85%
Reasoning
87%
Math
89%
Knowledge
86%
API pricing (per 1M tokens)
ModelInputOutputContext windowBest for
GPT-5.5$2.00$8.00128KCoding, agents
Claude Opus 4$15.00$75.00200KLong context, reasoning
Gemini 2.5 Pro$1.25$5.001MMultimodal, large docs
GPT-4o$2.50$10.00128KBalanced performance
Claude Sonnet 4$3.00$15.00200KCost-efficient quality
Llama 4 Scout$0.11$0.3410MOpen source, budget
About this benchmark comparator

This tool aggregates benchmark results from official model evaluations and independent testing to give developers a clear picture of how leading AI models compare. Benchmarks include HumanEval and SWE-bench for coding, MMLU and GPQA for knowledge, MATH and AIME for mathematics, and HELM for overall capability.

Benchmark scores should be treated as directional signals rather than definitive rankings. Real-world performance varies significantly by task type, prompt style, and use case. The best model for your project depends on your specific requirements for capability, cost, context length, and latency.

Frequently asked questions
Which AI model is best for coding?+
GPT-5.5 leads on HumanEval and SWE-bench coding benchmarks as of mid-2026. Claude Opus 4 and Claude Sonnet 4 are strong alternatives particularly for longer codebases due to their 200K context window. For open-source use cases, Llama 4 is competitive at a fraction of the cost.
Which model has the largest context window?+
Llama 4 Scout supports a 10 million token context window — by far the largest available. Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1 million tokens. Claude models support 200K. GPT models support 128K.
What is MMLU?+
MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) tests knowledge across 57 subjects including mathematics, history, law, medicine, and computer science. It is one of the most widely used benchmarks for measuring broad knowledge.
What is HumanEval?+
HumanEval is a coding benchmark from OpenAI consisting of 164 Python programming problems. Models must generate code that passes unit tests. It measures practical coding ability rather than theoretical knowledge.
AI Benchmark Comparator · Updated May 2026 · Hitechies Tools